The Partial-Birth Abortion Controversy
This commentary discusses the hypocrisy in the so-called partial-birth abortion practice.
The following articles are related to the topic of ABORTION
This commentary discusses the hypocrisy in the so-called partial-birth abortion practice.
On May 17, 2009, President Obama called for a sensible debate on abortion during his commencement speech at Notre Dame University. However, when he was asked directly, “At what point does a baby get human rights?” by Rick Warren, the President ducked with the best of them: “that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade.”
Americans’ views on abortion seem to be shifting, according to recent polling data.
This essay discusses the illogical positions that many argue with reference to aborition.
What theory can possibly rationalize the act of killing an unborn child? Some attempt this ethical manipulation by the use of an antiquated argument employed in defence of Darwin’s theory of evolution.
It is sometimes claimed that Exodus 21:22-23 provides evidence that a fetus is not entitled to the same legal protection as the mother, and, therefore, is not treated as an equal “person.” Is this an accurate exegesis of the text?
Are contraceptive methods of birth control equivalent to the practice of abortion?
Do preborn babies deserve human rights protections? An honest look at the scientific evidence.
Murder is always a despicable act.
Perhaps the most amazing thing about this procedure is the floodlight it casts upon the “person” inside the womb.
Shepard was a twenty-one-year-old student at the University of Wyoming. He openly professed homosexuality. Apparently, he was lured from a bar and taken to a remote place; there he was tied to a fence, pistol-whipped, and left exposed in the cold. Eventually, he died.
It is time that we recognize the value of our children. They are the future of this world. We must care for them, teach them, and fortify their precious souls against the evils that would assault them.
This editorial discusses the comments of the Jewish scholar, Alfred Edersheim, on the moral character of first-century Roman society.
This proverb has a modern-day application to the practice of abortion.
Allen Webster’s new book is a valuable study on Jehovah’s attitude towards those often quoted “seven things” he hates. We highly recommend this as a welcome addition to your library.
This editorial discusses the new abortion pill, RU-486.
Some allege that voting in elections is a Christian obligation. Others contend that it is an option, but not an obligation? Where does the truth lie? May Christians disagree on this issue without dissension?
What is the relationship between the Christian and the government?
The judgment pronounced on pagan nations by Amos the prophet point to the accountability of all people to the laws of God.
It is not so much Singer’s nutty ideas about animals that is the focus of controversy (he refuses to wear leather); it is his views about humans—and their relevance in comparison to animals.