1 Chronicles 15:2 – The Law of Silence
Many today strongly contend that the silence of the Bible is not prohibitive. However, a comparison of some Old Testament passages indicates otherwise.
We are presently deploying a new version of ChristianCourier.com. You may experience technical problems while accessing certain features. Please know we are working hard to promptly fix any bugs that might impact your experience on this site.
Many today strongly contend that the silence of the Bible is not prohibitive. However, a comparison of some Old Testament passages indicates otherwise.
Some may jump to the conclusion that the Bible contradicts itself with regard to Jesse’s sons. But such a conclusion is not necessary.
Reckless charges are frequently made against the Bible. One of these is the allegation that the Scriptures contain irrelevant data, i.e., material too trivial to justify its inclusion into a body of literature that purports to be inspired of God.
Does 1 Corinthians 14:26ff authorize solos or choirs in New Testament worship?
The term “silence” in 1 Corinthians 14:34 is often misunderstood and misapplied. Must a woman keep “silent” in the church?
Did the apostle Paul teach that baptism was not necessary for salvation from sins? By no means. Study this passage with us.
Some contend this passage indicates that miracles are a present-day reality. Wayne Jackson explains why this cannot be true.
Does this passage teach the much coveted doctrine of “the perseverance of the saints”? No it does not. This article explains why.
A discussion of whether a Christian can appeal to civil law in a defense against another Christian
When the conditions God are happily met, one may be assured of the merciful pardon of Heaven.
Christ is our attorney, pleading our case before the Father. What a thrilling concept!
Is the antichrist a character soon to be revealed on the stage of world events? Who is this person?
What was the sin of Jeroboam? Unauthorized innovation — still a problem to this day.
Premillenialists, desperately clinging to the notion that the “land promise” to the Israelites is yet unfulfilled, disregard clear Bible testimony.
The first epistle bearing Peter’s name speaks of “true grace.” Let us consider more closely the theme of “true grace,” for it is implied that there might be a false concept of grace.
When 1 Peter 1:1, 2 is seen in concert with related biblical material, the doctrine of election is removed from the confusing fog of sectarian dogma.
A comparison of 1 Peter 1:22 and Acts 2:38 amplifies the meaning of “obedience to the truth.”
Where is the hope of the righteous to be eternally realized — on earth or in heaven? The Bible’s answer is very clear.
The Scriptures teach that human beings have a spirit/soul that is capable of suffering everlasting punishment.
The first king of Israel’s fall from grace can serve as a warning for us today.
The Old Testament identifies the father of Samuel the prophet as both a Levite and an Ephraimite. How can this be? Did the Old Testament writers make a mistake? Not hardly. Below is one possible explanation for the seeming conflict.
The Bible knows nothing of an arbitrary divine election separate from human responsibility.
What does it mean to be “converted”?
Study with us three important points from this passage.
The Bible explicitly teaches that immersion is “for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38).